ReviseMy Try with your agent

Competitor alternative

Pastel

Best Pastel alternative when an agent is in the loop

Pastel makes share-a-link annotation feel instant for clients. ReviseMy keeps that link simplicity for reviewers — and adds the MCP ship loop Pastel was never built to own.

People search for a Pastel alternative when client comments need to become agent work, when reviews include app screenshots or email HTML — not only live sites — or when “inbox zero” comments still leave the coding agent guessing. Pastel is excellent for low-friction visual feedback and approvals on websites and assets. ReviseMy is the stronger alternative when a human must mark intent on captures and an agent must follow next_action until approve — with a board that separates resolved from verified.

Why people look for a Pastel alternative

  • Comments need to become structured pins for an agent, not only export to a PM tool.
  • You review agent UI, slides, or email HTML as often as live marketing sites.
  • You want authoritative owner marks vs guest suggestions vs optional AI hints.
  • Multi-pass agent work needs before/after evidence and human verification.

What to look for

  • Share-link friction for non-technical reviewers
  • Whether an agent can consume the feedback without a human retyping tickets
  • Coverage beyond live websites (screenshots, PDF, HTML)
  • Clear separation of suggestions vs decisions

Recommended options

These are not interchangeable replacements. Each option solves a different version of the problem people usually mean when they search.

Recommended

ReviseMy

Secret review links for humans; MCP for agents. Same checkup loop across UI, websites, email, and slides.

Best for: Teams shipping with coding agents who still want client or designer eyes on the pixels.

  • No account required for reviewers
  • Guest links for suggestions only
  • Board + resolve_marks for the agent
  • Connectors for ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Cursor, Grok

Marker.io

Live-site visual bug reporting with rich browser context into existing PM tools.

Best for: Human QA → Jira/Linear without an agent loop.

  • Browser and technical metadata
  • PM tool destinations
  • Production bug reporting workflows

When to keep Pastel

  • Keep Pastel for agency client proofing when there is no coding agent and speed-to-annotate is the whole product.
  • Use ReviseMy when the next reader of feedback is an agent on MCP.
  • You can keep Pastel for marketing-site client rounds and ReviseMy for agent-built product UI.
  • If export-to-Asana/Jira is the success metric and agents are out of scope, Pastel (or Marker/Lucidly) may fit better.

Recommendation

Choose ReviseMy if reviewers need a simple link and agents need structured next_action. Choose Pastel if the workflow is human client annotation on sites/assets with no agent ship loop.

FAQ

Is ReviseMy as easy for clients as Pastel?

Reviewers open a secret link and mark — no MCP, no ReviseMy account. Guest links are suggestions-only. Setup complexity sits with the person connecting the agent.

Does ReviseMy annotate live DOM elements like Pastel?

ReviseMy marks regions on captured screenshots (including URL capture). It is capture-based, not a live DOM overlay product.

Can I use both?

Yes. Pastel for classic client website rounds; ReviseMy when an agent owns the implementation pass.

Keep exploring

Try with your agent