ReviseMy Try with your agent

Competitor alternative

Lucidly

Best Lucidly alternative when agents ship the site

Lucidly organizes website QA comments into a Kanban for agencies and clients. ReviseMy organizes marks for an agent that must fix, prove, and wait for human verify.

People look for a Lucidly alternative when the “dev team” is increasingly an AI agent, when feedback spans app UI and email — not only marketing sites — or when status needs a human verification gate after the agent claims done. Lucidly is a strong, focused website QA and collaboration product (comments, guests, Kanban). ReviseMy is the stronger alternative when the consumer of feedback is an agent over MCP and “done” means a human verified the pixels on the board — not only a card moved on a Kanban.

Why people look for a Lucidly alternative

  • Implementers are agents that need resolve_marks and next_action, not only assigned Kanban cards.
  • You need before/after evidence and human-only verified status.
  • Checkups include screenshots, PDF slides, or email HTML as well as live URLs.
  • You want second-opinion checklist/vision hints that never override human marks.

What to look for

  • Agency client QA vs agent-native ship loops
  • Kanban for humans vs board lifecycle for agent+human
  • Seat/guest model vs secret review links + try tokens
  • Whether MCP connectors matter more than unlimited collaborators

Recommended options

These are not interchangeable replacements. Each option solves a different version of the problem people usually mean when they search.

Recommended

ReviseMy

Open-source human-in-the-loop design review for agents. Marks, board, second opinion, connectors — built for the MCP checkup loop.

Best for: Product and eng teams (and agencies) where agents build and humans approve.

  • MCP Apps or review_url workflows
  • Owner board with verify gate
  • Type-aware checkups (UI, website, email, slides)
  • Guest suggestions without giving away authority

Pastel

Lightweight link-based annotation — a close peer when you want speed over Kanban depth.

Best for: Fast client markup without a heavy QA suite.

  • Share-link collaboration
  • Live site and asset feedback
  • Low onboarding for clients

When to keep Lucidly

  • Keep Lucidly for multi-client website QA where humans triage on a Kanban and no agent owns the fix.
  • Use ReviseMy when the studio runs coding agents and needs MCP handoff plus verification.
  • Agencies can keep Lucidly for client marketing sites and ReviseMy for agent-built product work.
  • If unlimited collaborators and agency pricing are the buying criteria and agents are irrelevant, Lucidly may be the better fit.

Recommendation

Choose ReviseMy if agents implement feedback and humans must verify on a board. Choose Lucidly if your core product is collaborative website QA with Kanban for human teams and clients.

FAQ

Does ReviseMy have a Kanban like Lucidly?

ReviseMy has an owner board with open → in progress → resolved → verified columns aimed at the agent loop — not a full agency project Kanban with assignees and digests.

Can clients comment without an account?

Yes via guest links (suggestions). Owner marks stay authoritative. See the reviewers audience page for the human path.

Is ReviseMy open source?

Yes — self-host or use a hosted deploy; homepage try tokens work without a ReviseMy account for reviewers.

Keep exploring

Try with your agent