ReviseMy Try with your agent

Competitor alternative

Figma comments

Best Figma comments alternative when your agent ships the UI

Figma comments are excellent on design files. ReviseMy is for the pixels your agent actually built — marks that drive next_action, not another thread in the canvas.

People search for a Figma comments alternative for different reasons: the UI already exists in staging or screenshots, the builder is a coding agent that needs structured work packets, or design-file comments never map cleanly to “what to change next” in the repo. Figma remains the right place to critique components and systems in the design file. ReviseMy is the stronger alternative when the real problem is human-in-the-loop review of agent-built UI — with authoritative marks, a status board, and MCP handoff — without asking everyone to live in Figma for every pass.

Why people look for a Figma comments alternative

  • The screen already shipped from an agent — feedback belongs on the capture, not only on a Figma frame that may be out of date.
  • You need a clear next_action for the agent (wait, apply marks, open another pass), not a comment that dies in a design tool.
  • Reviewers should mark and approve without a Figma seat; guests leave suggestions without owning the decision.
  • You want open → resolved → verified status across passes, with optional before/after evidence — not only “resolved” in a comment thread.

What to look for

  • Whether feedback lives on design files or on the pixels the agent shipped
  • Whether the agent can poll structured work packets over MCP (or REST)
  • Whether human marks stay authoritative vs optional AI hints
  • Whether multi-pass reviews stay scannable on a board

Recommended options

These are not interchangeable replacements. Each option solves a different version of the problem people usually mean when they search.

Recommended

ReviseMy

Human-in-the-loop design checkup for AI agents. Capture UI, websites, email, or slides; mark with intent; track the board; send next_action back over MCP.

Best for: Teams where an agent builds UI and a human must approve before the loop stops.

  • Authoritative rose marks → work_packets.pins
  • Board: open → resolved → verified
  • Second opinion stays suggestions only
  • Free try token — no account for reviewers

Pastel

Fast visual annotation on live sites and assets via a share link — strong for client proofing without an agent in the loop.

Best for: Agency or client website QA when nobody needs MCP next_action.

  • Link-based annotation
  • Live site and asset markup
  • Client-friendly, low install friction

When to keep Figma comments

  • Keep Figma comments for design-system and file-level critique before anything is built.
  • Use ReviseMy after the agent ships screenshots or a URL — marks map to code work, not to layers.
  • You can run both: Figma for craft in the file, ReviseMy for the agent ship loop.
  • If there is no coding agent and all work stays in Figma, stay in Figma.

Recommendation

Choose ReviseMy if an agent ships UI and you need human marks that drive the next pass over MCP. Choose Figma comments if the artifact is still the design file and the builder is a human in Figma — not an agent waiting on next_action.

FAQ

Is ReviseMy a Figma replacement?

No. ReviseMy does not replace Figma as a design tool. It is an alternative feedback surface when the thing to review is agent-built UI (screenshots, capture URL, PDF, HTML) and the consumer of feedback is an agent.

Can designers use ReviseMy without MCP?

Yes. Reviewers only need the secret review link. MCP setup is for the person connecting the agent.

What about Figma Make or Dev Mode handoff?

Those stay in the Figma ecosystem. ReviseMy starts when pixels exist outside the file and an agent needs structured marks to continue.

Keep exploring

Try with your agent